smith and wesson 586 vs 686

2 min read 27-12-2024
smith and wesson 586 vs 686

Choosing between the Smith & Wesson Model 586 and 686 is a classic dilemma for revolver enthusiasts. Both are iconic .357 Magnum revolvers renowned for their accuracy, reliability, and robust construction. However, subtle yet significant differences exist that can sway your decision based on your specific needs and preferences. This in-depth comparison will explore those key distinctions to help you make an informed choice.

Key Differences: Material and Finish

The most significant difference lies in the frame material:

  • Model 586: Features a carbon steel frame. This results in a heavier revolver, contributing to enhanced balance and reduced recoil. The heavier weight also makes it more durable, capable of withstanding more rigorous use. However, carbon steel is susceptible to rust if not properly maintained.

  • Model 686: Boasts a stainless steel frame. This offers superior corrosion resistance, making it ideal for use in various weather conditions. Stainless steel is also less prone to scratching than carbon steel, maintaining its appearance better over time. While slightly lighter than the 586, it still provides excellent balance and manageable recoil.

Performance and Handling: A Detailed Look

While both revolvers offer exceptional performance, minor differences in weight influence handling characteristics:

  • Recoil Management: The heavier 586 absorbs recoil more effectively, making it potentially more comfortable for extended shooting sessions or practice. The 686, while manageable, might exhibit slightly more felt recoil due to its lower weight.

  • Balance and Accuracy: The weight distribution of the 586 contributes to a more stable platform for aiming, potentially leading to improved accuracy, particularly for novice shooters. The 686's slightly lighter weight doesn't significantly impact accuracy for experienced shooters but may be a factor for those less familiar with revolvers.

  • Maintenance: The carbon steel 586 requires more diligent cleaning and lubrication to prevent rust. The stainless steel 686 is less maintenance-intensive, offering a more convenient ownership experience.

Features and Considerations Beyond the Frame

Beyond the frame material, other factors can influence your decision:

  • Barrel Length: Both models are available in various barrel lengths, each influencing balance, accuracy, and concealability. Consider the intended use of the revolver when selecting a barrel length.

  • Sight Configuration: Both revolvers offer adjustable sights, allowing for precise zeroing. However, some variations exist in sight types across different production runs.

  • Finish: While both are available in various finishes, the stainless steel 686 generally holds its finish better over time compared to the blued carbon steel of the 586.

  • Price: Generally, the Model 686 commands a slightly higher price due to the stainless steel construction and increased corrosion resistance.

Which Revolver is Right for You?

The best choice depends on individual priorities:

  • Choose the 586 if: You prioritize a heavier, more recoil-absorbing revolver with superior balance and accuracy, and you're willing to dedicate extra effort to maintenance.

  • Choose the 686 if: You prefer a corrosion-resistant, low-maintenance revolver that's easy to clean and maintain, even in challenging environments. The slightly lighter weight might be preferable for concealed carry or extended periods of use.

Ultimately, both the Smith & Wesson 586 and 686 are high-quality revolvers capable of delivering exceptional performance. Carefully considering your shooting style, intended use, and personal preferences will guide you to the perfect fit. Handling both models if possible, would be highly recommended before making a final decision.

Related Posts


close